|
|
|
| Is
it music or mental re-programming?
Michael
A. Dingwall (michael_a_dingwall@hotmail.com)
Recently, I was
watching a cartoon about how some villains were trying to take
over the world. They
were trying to accomplish their conquest of earth by feeding
humanity with music that had some secret brainwashing lyrics.
After listening to the song, the people would all follow
the new leader – blindly doing what he says.
While I was watching the cartoon, I could not help but be
reminded of Jamaica’s “music”.
Do we still produce music in Jamaica or is it now some kind
of mental re-programming?
For some time now, Jamaica’s
music scene has undergone some sort of revolution.
Gone are the days when music was something that all (or at
least most) could listen to without having to worry.
These days – Jamaica’s music is an incitement to
violence, hatred and ignorance.
Of particular concern, is the very disturbing trend of many
of our musicians urging us to take our brains out of our heads and
put all of our hopes in dead gods such as Jehovah, Jesus and
especially the skeletal remains of Ethiopia’s last emperor –
the late Selassie.
|
 |
Most of these musicians are really
ignorant thugs – incapable of much thinking.
This in itself would not be too bad – except for the fact
that many of our young people now see them as perfect role models. What they do is no longer “sing”, but incite.
[Continue]
|
| WHAT
THEN – DO WE SAY? PART TWO
Mike
Ramey (manhoodline@yahoo.com)
Warning: The Following Column
May Contain Language Unsuitable For Some Readers of “The Manhood
Line”
Time was, a boy who was fatherless due to the
premature death of his dad was taken under the wing of a variety
of upstanding men and built into a strong, confident and godly
man. Those members of the brotherhood deserve our appreciation.
Fast forward a few decades. A boy now has
additional reasons for being fatherless. He may be the result of a
weekend fling, a deliberate act of pregnancy, or a few clicks on
the Internet to have a child without the ring, rice, and preacher.
Oh yes, don’t expect the single mother to be all that anxious to
turn him over to the REAL men of the community for training.
Don’t shout me down when
I’m on a roll.
As
current society is rooted in sexual fantasy rather than marital
reality, we now have a cottage industry dedicated to the
fatherless; a host of grants and social programs designed to
replace the need for the Bible, marriage, the church, and upright
men. School houses have become one stop shopping centers. Forget
the 3 Rs; now we have health care, welfare, and legal aid in the
school house. Also, community centers and churches have after
hours programs to replace family mealtime. Social workers replace
family discussions. Jail, Juvie and waiver hearings replace
parental discipline.
What
of the single mother? Well, she can continue to ‘get her itch
scratched’ by whatever male who might be breathing (age is
optional). She does not worry about the need for marriage. Neither
does she have to ‘go public’ with her OOW bundle of joy for
manhood training of any type. Various family members, social
commentators, and church members have allowed her a ‘pass’ to
have full rights as a member of the community.
[Continue]
|
| Venezuela's
Disloyal Opposition Serves the Bush Administration
The Council on Hemispheric
Affairs (coha@coha.org)
In an arrant display of rank political
opportunism, Venezuela’s faltering middle-class opposition
parties have announced that they would boycott the December 4
legislative elections. Far from a principled and high minded move,
this tawdry tactic represents a cynical decision on the part of
the opposition to spare itself the inconvenience of once again
having to face the humiliating defeat that they surely would have
experienced at the polls. The opposition’s tactic is more in
line with a Tom Delay or Karl Rove ruse than something of
Jeffersonian stature.
While trumpeting claims about Venezuela’s
ebbing democracy, the opposition has proven itself to be far more
guilty of eroding the country’s democratic structures than any
grab for power by the chavistas.
In essence, the opposition is prepared to sacrifice the nation’s
democratic system to serve its immediate objective of ousting the
government by any means, on the false grounds that the authorities
cannot guarantee free and fair elections. Every election that has
been held in Venezuela since Chávez came to power has been
extensively monitored, and even the U.S. State Department has been
forced to grudgingly validate the authenticity of past results, as
their legitimacy was unimpeachable. |
| President
of Venezuela

Hugo Chavez |
|
Justifying the
Unjustified
The opposition parties, led by Acción
Democratica (AD), Proyecto
Venezuela and Copei
(Christian Democrats), at first based their protests on
concerns over the use of an electronic voting system,
which they claimed would make it possible for election
officials to obtain the identities of opposition voters.
After their complaints succeeded in convincing the
national electoral council (CNE) to refrain from
implementing a fingerprinting system, the opposition
parties subsequently declared that the removal of the
fingerprint scanners was insufficient and that the CNE
could not be trusted: in essence the opposition is crying
fraud before a single vote has been cast. Under these
rules, the Democrats would have been justified in dropping
out of the 2000 U.S. presidential election after their
candidate, Al Gore, had assumed that the Bush campaign
would be stealing the election before that ballot was even
staged. |
|
By choosing this truly undignified and
undemocratic tactic, the Venezuelan opposition has only weakened
its position in the eyes of the world. Had it participated in the
election, and succeeding in documenting fraud (an unlikely
scenario), it would have been able to make legitimate claims. But
by refusing even symbolic participation, the opposition has chosen
to court Washington alone, rather than convince the international
community of its democratic bonafides. In fact, the opposition has
taken this drastic move because it lacks any hope that it could
prevent itself from going down before a chavista
landslide victory.
[Continue]
|
| Punish
Corporate Predators: A Jamaican Case Study
Delroy
Scarlett, MCIM, MSc. (dhsscarlett@yahoo.com)
The
tendency of consumers to punish corporate predators, whether
perceived or real, was recently suspected in Jamaica, after the
monopoly on the telecommunications market was lifted by the
Jamaican government (Robinson, 2001). According to a report in the
Sunday Herald (2002)[i], consumers,
including a large portion of inner city residents, gravitated to
the new mobile provider, the Irish company Digicel, in droves. It
was a widely accepted view in Jamaica that the mass purchases of
mobile packages was likely to be a customer protest, after
experiencing several years of unfair, unethical and predatory
pricing practices and poor customer services by the monopoly
telecommunication provider.
According
to the Digicel Jamaica website (http://www.digiceljamaica.com/about/)[ii],
“…when Digicel launched their GSM mobile service in
Jamaica, the company anticipated reaching the 100,000 customer
plateau by the end of its first year in operation. They hit
the mark a mere 100 days after launch. Never before in the history
of mobile telecommunications had such tremendous growth been seen
in a network” (http://www.jamaica-leaner.com/gleaner/20020326/business/business1.html)
[iii] Digicel
overtook the competitor as the mobile provider with the largest
customer base in the island.
According
to the Digicel Jamaica website (at http://www.digiceljamaica.com/about/),
it took its major competitor approximately 10 years to reach the
400,000 customers mark. In comparison, it took Digicel about 13
months to reach the same figure. Digicel's customer base now
stands at over 1 million customers and the company
currently commands approximately 65% of the mobile market share in
Jamaica. All this achievement took place in only four years of
operation.
Digicel’s
customer profile also showed a significant proportion of poor
consumers who were predominantly first time mobile users who
previously could not afford to access mobile service from the
monopolistic mobile provider. The former monopoly has never
recovered from the massive exodus of its customers and
simultaneous mass migration to its competitors, who offered these
customers value for money while Digicel Jamaica continue reap the
profits.
[Continue]
|
| The
Politics of Race – An
examination of
W. E. Du Bios’ life
Paul
Andrew Bourne (paulbourne1@yahoo.com)
**
This article continues from the last edition **
Manifestations
of Marxian Materialist Dialectics
In
answering the fundamental sociological question (as to the origin
or existence of society), Marx employed a materialism approach. He began by analyzing human activity, and argued that
consciousness is a product of that (economic) activity (Key
Sociological Thinkers, 1998).
Thus, in the Preface to (A Contribution to the Critique
of Political Economy, 1859), he argued that “it is not the
consciousness of man that determines their existence, but their
social existence that determines their consciousness”.
In
his (Marx) views, society is the relationship acted out by
individuals in coming to terms with the material conditions of
their subsistence (Haralambos and Holborn, 2002).
For him, there needed to be a material makeover of society,
rather than a change in consciousness, for the achievement of
human freedom. In using the economic world or ‘historical materialism’
to analyze this transformation and development, Marx purported the
very social institutions originated from or exists in economic
behaviour (Classical Sociological Theory, 1997).
This may explain why Marx is credited with the position of
‘historical materialism’ or ‘economic determinism’. |
W. E. Du Bios |
|
Furthermore, Marxian
notion of the dialectic becomes even more recognizable in
his discourse concerning the components of the mode of
production or the economy, which are:
the means of production (ideological elements), and
the relations of production (material elements), otherwise
called the ‘structure’ or ‘infrastructure’ and the
‘superstructure’, respectively (Macionis and
Plummer, 1998, pp. 62).
In
recognizing that there is a dialectical interplay at all
times between the structure and the superstructure, Marx
purported that the economic system was the foundation of
the institutional order and everything else was (religion,
government, arts and marriage) was seen as a derivative
superstructure built upon the base of economics (Masters
of Sociological Thought, 1971).
The
clear dichotomy in the mode of production or economy is
actually a manifestation of his use of the dialectic.
Thus, this manifestation of dialectical intercourse
is also apparent as Marx goes on to discuss class, thus
analyzing social conflict and social change. |
|
In the Communist
Manifesto, it is argued that ‘the history of all
hitherto existing societies is the history of class struggle’.
Thus, concurrent with his ‘historical determinism’ or
historical materialism’ dialectics approach, Marx went on to
look at class conflict as being the driving force of social change
from one historical epoch to the next.
In distinguishing the
five (5) different historical epochs or stage of societies to
which every society exist or existed belong:
Primitive communism, ancient slavery, feudal society,
capitalism and ultimately communism societies.
Marx forwarded a position that class society began when the
structure and-or superstructure was no longer communally owned,
and thereby moved to privatization of resources (Classical
Sociological Theory). As
such, class emerges and along with it, class conflict (due to the
separation of wealth in the mode of production), there also
emerged a dialectical struggle that characterized the relationship
between the rulers and the ruled, the oppressor and the oppressed
(Master of Sociological Thought, 1971, pp.).
[Continue]
|
| Travel
+ Leisure Magazine's 2005 Global Vision Award Honors Falmouth
Heritage Renewal for Preserving Cultural Heritage of Falmouth,
Jamaica
Chris
Enlow (chris.enlow@gmail.com)
Every day, all around the world, natural and
cultural wonders are being threatened by pollution,
overdevelopment, and other seemingly inevitable by-products of
modern life. But look a little closer and you'll find organization
such as Falmouth Heritage Renewal making a difference.
Falmouth
Heritage Renewal is the recipient of Travel + Leisure Magazine’s
2005 Global Vision Award for preserving the Historic District of
Falmouth and bolstering the community surrounding it.
Travel + Leisure Magazine introduced the Global Vision
Awards in order to recognize the most innovative projects and
organizations that are defending the historical, cultural, and
ecological integrity of the traveler's world. To learn more about
this Award, visit www.travelandleisure.com.
A leading outpost for the British Empire in the
19th century, Falmouth, Jamaica, was a busy port town full of
elegant townhouses, merchant stores, and residences. With some of
the richest examples of Georgian architecture in the Caribbean,
Falmouth remains a city of immense cultural importance. Having
been passed over by the island's thriving tourism industry,
however, the town is facing alarmingly high unemployment rates,
and its historic buildings are in a state of severe disrepair.
Falmouth Heritage Renewal, a four-year-old
US-based grassroots non-profit organization, is tackling the
city's problems by training locals in restoration and putting them
to work to save the historic architecture. Falmouth Heritage
Renewal hopes to eventually draw thousands of tourists to the
historic district, thereby revitalizing the area's economy. The
organization has already trained 34 young Jamaicans in carpentry
and in the manufacture and use of mortar for preservation work.
The group has restored nearly two dozen edifices, ranging from
modest single-room houses to colonnaded commercial
buildings—structures that provide vivid insight into the lives
of both the slave owners and the emancipated slaves who
constructed the city in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. To
learn more, visit www.falmouthjamaica.org.
“Our efforts
in Falmouth are a growing success because of the collaborative
work that we do with Custos Barrett of the Parish of Trelawny,
Mayor Bartley of the Trelawny Parish Council, Falmouth Restoration
Company, Falmouth Tourist Board, HEART Trust/NTA Falmouth VTC, and
the William Knibb Trust,” comments Dr. James Parrent, Executive
Director of Falmouth Heritage Renewal.
“I want to recognize these groups for all their hard work
and passion in preserving the historic integrity of Falmouth.
The Travel + Leisure Award acknowledges not only the great
work of Falmouth Heritage Renewal, but that of the entire
community.”
For additional
information about the Global Vision Award: http://www.travelandleisure.com/globalvision/.
The mission statement of Falmouth Heritage Renewal (FHR) is to preserve
and restore the historic buildings of Falmouth, Jamaica while
making the lives of the people who live there better.
Founded in 2001, FHR is a United States registered 501
(c)(3) non-profit organization. FHR works in partnership with the
Falmouth Restoration Company, a Jamaican non-profit charity with a
mission to preserve the historic integrity of Falmouth.
|
|
|